Blocked
Which country was this coffee grown in?
ALS-COFFEE-1.0-PROV-001
This question matters to a buyer and CANNOT be answered from a public product page today. What would be required is stated in full.
Why this cannot be run
Blocked by G-01.
Assertion
growing_country is_stated true
Applicability
- applies when
- the product is roasted coffee
- signal
- product_type or title indicates coffee
Accepted evidence
- product_description — a named growing country attributed to this coffee, distinct from where it was roasted
- structured_data — the same statement inside the JSON-LD product description
Explicitly insufficient evidence
What does not count, and why. Published because the omission is where a check quietly becomes a claim.
- "Product of USA", "Made in USA", "Roasted in USA"
Under customs substantial-transformation practice these describe ROASTING, so a check that maps them to growing origin will systematically record Ethiopian coffee as American. The legally correct origin marking is the one that hides the answer buyers want, and this is the highest-value trap in the whole standard. - "Italian roast", "French roast", "Vienna roast"
These are roast-degree style names, and Italian roast is the canonical false positive for any origin extractor. - "Imported"
It satisfies a marking requirement while naming no country at all. - a region, farm, washing station or varietal name with no country
Evocative and unresolvable; several region names exist in more than one country and some varietal names are also place names. - "Latin American blend" or "African blend"
A region is not a country, and blend composition legitimately varies batch to batch. - a flag emoji or graphic
Not page text, not read by the engine, and frequently decorative rather than a claim.
Conflict rules
- When a roasting location and a growing country both appear — then attribute each to its own act; a roasting statement must never satisfy a growing-origin assertion precedence: product_description > structured_data
- When the product is a blend naming several countries — then record all named origins; "a place is stated" and "the origin of this coffee is stated" are different questions and the second is the one asked
Discrimination
Predicted fail rate: 20-55% (predicted, not yet measured)
Specialty coffee names origins constantly while supermarket-style listings often do not, so a real split exists. The band is a hypothesis about two seller populations and the engine has no mechanism to measure it, which is why the entry is blocked rather than predicted with confidence.
For a shopper
Where coffee is roasted and where it is grown are different facts, and the phrase you are most likely to see on a US bag describes roasting. If the page names no growing country, no amount of made-in wording fills that gap.
For a merchant
Name the growing country in product text, keeping it clearly distinct from any statement about where the coffee was roasted, and add the region where you know it.
Grounding
- US Customs and Border Protection, country-of-origin marking practice on roasting as substantial transformation (regulator)
that roasting imported green coffee is treated as substantially transforming it, which is why product-of-USA wording on a coffee bag describes roasting and not growing — the mechanism behind the standard's most consequential false-positive risk - Independent refuting pass, live search-intent retrieval (internal_measurement)
that grown-versus-roasted origin sits in the verified shopper-driven core, grounded in documented deception rather than in query volume